Private labels take on the old brands

Oh no! Private labels are killing brands!Grocery brands are being replaced by private labels

Branded retail goods should be (and most are) paying attention to what’s happening. Customers’ love affair with private label products is growing, and that shows no sign of slowing. But it’s not a case of private labels killing brands; private labels ARE brands.

From Target’s premium brand Archer Farms, to Walmart’s evolving Great Value line, these store brands are anything but generic. Private labels are much more than a cheaper version of the national brands, with unique products and killer benefits, the retailers are beating many national brands at their own game.

Customer sentiment by the numbers

The research group Mintel has found that 44% of grocery store customers believe store brand products are better today than they were five years ago. Only 19% of surveyed customers say it’s worth paying more for name-brand products. Most categories show customer preference to be in favor of the store-brand products, with the only exception being soft-drinks and personal care products. Local store brands have an appearance of freshness when it comes to bread, dairy, and similar fresh products, while 61% surveyed do not believe there’s a difference in canned and shelf-stable foods. This really puts the odds against the national brands.

How are private labels gaining this traction?

So what’s the difference? First, many retail chains have been investing in private label products that are superior in quality to the national leading brands. They have been spending the time on research and development to make a product that performs better, and worried less about being the cheapest product. Second, the retailers are promoting their own brands with multiple marketing efforts to spread the message that their own products are high quality. Since retailers have the ultimate say on in-store marketing, this really tips the favor in their own court.

What I believe to be one of the most significant differences, retailers are carefully developing a strong packaging look for their products to make them aesthetically superior. Packaging is one of the most powerful in-store marketing tools, and the retailers are really nailing this aspect. The days of copying the national brand seem to be over, and private labels are building their own identities. This illustrates to the consumer that the products are different than the leading consumer brands, frequently using very fresh and clean design with a heavy emphasis on product over gimmicks.

Is it game-over for mega-brands?

The message to package goods manufacturers: start taking risks, making changes, and promote! You have brand equity and recognition, but you need to remind people what your brand stands for. Centuries of history have shown that marketing and innovation work. That’s not going to change any time soon.

  • http://TannerChristensen.com tannerc

    What about the recent recession? Could an impact on consumer’s wallets carry over to the types of brand products they buy? Then we can also take a look at the “green”, organic, and natural trend, where shoppers are becoming more savvy knowing that the products they buy don’t ultimately end up just at home.

    Personally, I haven’t bought brand name products in some time now. Marketing cheaper and “greener” products has impacted me, and if news releases are anything to go by the impact has been universal.

    What do you think?

  • http://www.brandsanatomy.com/ Nick

    I think recession can be a catalyst to get a customer to try new products. The survey sentiment showed an overwhelming feeling that the store brands are as good and some better than the competition, which shows a growing preference. Many store brands, such as Target’s Archer Farms are sold at premium prices to the national brands, which shows it’s not as much an economical preference, as an emotional and logical response to buy products you find superior.

    As you mentioned, green and organic trend products have impacted the brands that consumers are buying. However, I see just as many of those buzzwords used on the national brands as well. It can lead people to try new things, and buying from a more local supply chain is a better choice. Many store brands are regionally produced.

    Personally, I buy nearly everything fresh & raw. With the exception of a couple items like packaged yogurt, soy milk, & an occasional bottled soft drink, everything I buy is out of the produce, dairy, or butcher section. That’s a trend I’d love to see everyone get on board with. Let’s get the local farms back into business and eat fresh.

  • http://www.shuaism.com Josh Peters

    Way to go Nick! This post is fantastic.I’ve been using store brands for a long time, and there are a lot I buy on a frequent basis (like Archer Farms). It’s not that I care so much about the price (though that does weigh in on it), but I’ve found in many cases that the store brand is as good if not better than the “brand name” stuff. In these instances I don’t think it’s a problem with the name brand not properly leveraging their brand equity, but that the store brands are making better and better products (which is definitely a problem for the big name brands).

    So I guess the next question is this. Should the big name brands launch better marketing campaigns, or should they be innovating more? Sometimes a new product blows up in your face (like New Coke) and other times it opens new markets (like Diet Coke, Cherry Coke, etc.). Maybe it’s a good solid mix of the two?

    Either way, great article.

  • http://twitter.com/axabdullah64 abdullah

    Few months ago M in really trouble that how can I expert in e-management system then I decide to search best place for it and finally I found best education system, check it out…..
    http://www.3deducators.com/sunsetprograms.asp

blog comments powered by Disqus

Switch to our mobile site